It's been a good read this thread, seeing it develop.
Taken on a global level it's patently obvious to any brain capable of thought that Britain/Europe are right up there in the Champions League in regard to quality of life but that's just the way it is, we got lucky with the life dice. But that doesn't mean we don't have a right to demand an equitable and just share of the pie (obviously individual definitions of that will vary) and that we see an improvement and expansion in our quality of life. But that's bollox though innit? Because right now it seems there's less and less equitable and just anything, there's scant evidence I can see of improvement or expansion. Several other posters have noted how we're pretty much moving backwards as far as any sort of financial/economic situation is concerned Danny's post in particular resonated. I earn a decentish wage (although believe me the Gender pay gap IS real - promise you), but the costs of everything put together just to keep a minimal quality of life for me & my son with a few special things each is now pretty much impossible to balance with income and when the next round of increases in everything comes in April ......
The idea that we are in it together and that while wages have stagnated/shrunk and while cost of living has increased to atone for the financial disasters and the idea that those responsible or who benefited from the good times have also shared the costs is simply laughable. But such is the way of the world for those of us in western Europe at least so Ruscoe - Give or take a few variations here and there pretty much everywhere is the same - have I helped ?

I agree with much of what you post Anna.
But a couple of points. you talk about "those responsible". Yepp banks, politicians etc were at the core, but so are we. We personally ramped up too much personal debt, we took out credit we couldn't afford, we spent more than we had thinking we could pay it back, we extended ourselves further than our abilities would ever allow us to recoup. That wasn't the banks fault, in the end some personal responsibility has to come back to those that spent too much in better times, not because we needed to to survive, but because we wanted to. And I hold my own hands up along everyone else here. I know there is heroin available in certain pubs near me, doesn't mean I've got to take it though!

You say
But that doesn't mean we don't have a right to demand an equitable and just share of the pie (obviously individual definitions of that will vary)
.
That is a great sentence and I note you also pointed out that it will mean different things to different people. and you are 100% correct. What is equitable? What just share? And by far the biggest question to me; what right?
If we postulate on those 3 from left to right, and let me say straight away I don't have an answer, I have a viewpoint. That there is the real problem we all have. Someone is going to have to impose their viewpoint on others, which can be kryptonite to democracy I'm afraid (though I'm sure some would argue that is happening anyway).
Equitable? the easier of the 3 probably. I think we can all agree that the minimum wage needs raising. But how high. If I were an employee I would have one answer, but as an employer which I am I can give you a ceiling over which I would struggle to keep my business going. So who feels lucky punks?

(BTW I pay salaries monthly not minimum wage OK!!!!).
Just share? Now it gets much much harder. I can only use my business as a template here, and perhaps that can extrapolate? I started my business with my business partner (a woman Anna, 50/50 ok equal!

), with what we had in our bank accounts which wasn't much, loans from family converted to shares and a bank loan (with guarantees attached they would take everything I own if it failed). We worked all the hours god sent in the 1990s and now it is a decent SME employing people. So here is the pop quiz? If someone joined in 2002, should I give them part ownership as a just share? Nope is my answer. Because they took no risk to start it, me and my partner and the shareholders did.
The difference being I get risk reward of ownership I'm always thinking worrying doing business, employees get (from us) a decent salary for a set number of hours and then they can leave their work behind and go home. If it fails they lose a job, I lose a job and everything, plus future earnings garnered to pay back the bank. And I believe, though luckily not had to test, as a past director I would struggle to access benefits I would need to survive, that the employees would be able to. I also have the burden of responsibility for them, which I take very seriously. But hold the phone....the Green party want automatic company ownership by employees. Just? That is the question!
The impossible question,and you alluded to it is Rights? Do people have a right to demand money from my business, which they did not struggle to create or take risk in. Yes and no is my answer.
Yes, I and the company believe we as a civilised society must protect anyone not as fortunate, so I happily (well my accountant would say I moan but hey-ho) pay all my taxes. I do not believe in tax avoidance, though I do not blame companies for doing it though and before you all start shouting, all the government need to do if they are serious is close the loopholes we do not need permission from other countries for us to do it ourselves. so appealing for morality to the corporate world is hit and miss. Blame the politicos! Having said that we are the 3rd highest taxed country in the G20!!!
But there are people in society, a minority true, who actually contribute very little. Should they have a right to take over my company or raid the coffers? If so, why? If the answer you give is yes, then it would be easier for me to shut it down, and join their ranks, I might get a free weekend now and again!

Again I've droned on....but to me these excellent things Anna poses are answerable, but not in our current polarised political world. We seem to tattoo "socialist", capitalist", "eco-warrior" etc onto our foreheads and n'er the twain shall meet. Most solutions, the best are compromise and mixes of ideologies, like a good dish. but at the moment I don't think we are grown up politically as a nation to make those decisions